Skip navigation
BARDEHLE PAGENBERG Impact. Passion. IP.
BARDEHLE PAGENBERG
  • Français
    • English
    • Deutsch
    • Español
    • 中文
    • 日本語
  • Chercher
  • IP Academy
  • Contact
  • Recrutement
  • Presse
  • Le cabinet
    • Qui sommes-nous
    • Nos Bureaux
      • Munich
      • Düsseldorf
      • Hamburg
      • Paris
      • Barcelone
      • Singapour
    • Prix & Revue de presse
    • Autres Services
  • Équipe
  • Our values
    • Law & Democracy
    • Equal opportunities
    • Durabilité
    • Compliance
    • Quality Management
  • Compétences
    • Domaines juridiques
      • Contrefaçon de brevet
      • Opposition et nullité des brevets
      • Licences d’exploitation
      • Action en revendication
      • Droit des inventions de salariés
      • Droit de la concurrence déloyale
      • Demande de brevet
      • Droit des marques
      • Dessins et modèles
      • Droits d’auteur
      • Droit des noms de domaine
      • Droit des ententes
      • Évaluation de brevets
      • Due diligence raisonnable en propriété intellectuelle
      • Secret des affaires
    • Secteurs industriels
      • Télécommunications
      • Logiciels, informatique et ordinateurs
      • Articles de sport
      • Techniques médicales
      • Électronique/électrotechnique
      • Automotive
      • Construction de machines
      • Chimie, pharmacie, sciences de la vie
      • Physique
      • Semi-conducteurs
      • Alimentation
      • Mode
  • Actualités et connaissance
    • Actualités PI
    • Actualités du cabinet
    • Événement IP
    • Vidéos sur la PI
    • Académie PI
    • UPC Decisions
    • European Software Patents
    • Brochures PI & Livres
  • UPC Special
 
Tout Actualités et connaissance
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • »

Actualités PI on 10/18/2019

Sufficiency of Disclosure and Enablement; German...

considered the provision of only one enabling way of the claimed invention in the form of the threshold value of 100:0% not sufficient regarding the distribution of 50:50% to 100:0% of the steam...

 

Actualités PI on 11/17/2016

EPO Board of Appeal 3.5.07 on public prior use by...

step-by-step. The information provided by the stepwise execution of the software product represented a form of disclosure of a specific embodiment of this method. Moreover, any interested person...

 

Actualités PI on 10/09/2017

European Court of Justice: No limitation of relevant...

However, the text of the regulation gives no indication of such an extension of the requirements. Hence, the invalidity applicant is still only required to prove that an act of disclosure has...

 

Actualités du cabinet on 04/26/2018

BARDEHLE defends patent owned by Rogers Germany GmbH...

Europe GmbH filed a nullity complaint against the German part of the patent, alleging that the claimed method lacks (i) sufficient disclosure, (ii) novelty over three prior art documents, and...

 

Actualités PI on 02/02/2012

German Federal Supreme Court strengthens position of...

manifest in that only 12 of the 26 claims of the foreign-language application were entirely translated. The legal fiction of the non-filed application – that is the denial of the filing date –...

 

Actualités PI on 03/30/2020

Obligations of SEP holders and SEP users (Higher...

Regional Court of Karlsruhe (“Higher Regional Court”) relates to the specification of various criteria regarding the enforcement of standard-essential patents laid down by the Court of Justice o...

 

Actualités PI on 03/16/2016

German Federal Supreme Court: Infringement of a...

Court, an average degree of distinctiveness of the claimed mark and, in light of identity of goods and high similarity of the 3-D signs at issue, an overall sufficient likelihood of confusion....

 

Événements PI on 03/07/2023

How to patent AI inventions at the EPO?

is one of the most rapidly developing fields of technology. The patentability of AI is a complex and evolving area of law. In particular, before the European Patent Office, there are a number of...

 

Événements PI on 02/20/2024

Beyond Precedent: A Fresh Look at AI Patenting with...

it about? Artificial intelligence (AI) is one of the fastest advancing areas of technology. The legal issues surrounding the patentability of AI are varied, complex, and constantly evolving....

 

Actualités du cabinet on 03/17/2014

OHIM’s Board of Appeal: BARDEHLE PAGENBERG again...

release of March 17, 2014 BARDEHLE PAGENBERG has been successful before the Board of Appeal of the Office for the Harmonisation of the Internal Market (OHIM) in Alicante, Spain, in upholding two...

 

Actualités PI on 06/24/2025

G 1/24: A win for claim interpretation, a setback for...

light of the entire disclosure. Rather, they have regularly taken the position that the meaning of the claim needs to be clear from the wording of the claim alone. Does this mean that, as a...

 

Actualités PI on 04/10/2025

Design Grace Period: European Court Provides Clarity on...

protection afforded by this provision. II. Analysis of the three main arguments 1. Burden of proof Lidl argued that the burden of proving the applicability of the grace period exception lies...

 

Actualités PI on 04/22/2017

EPO Board of Appeal 3.3.05 on the correct exercise of...

opposition was based on the grounds of inadmissible extension, lack of novelty and lack of inventive step. Document D1 was cited to substantiate lack of novelty, and the opponent argued that the...

 

Actualités du cabinet on 01/18/2013

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG successfully defends Skype against...

lawsuit – which is part of a series of further proceedings brought by the Via Vadis group in the United States and Luxembourg –, Via Vadis alleged infringement of the German part of European...

 

Actualités PI on 07/07/2020

FRAND objection: German Federal Court of Justice,...

III. The Decision of the German Federal Court of Justice The German Federal Court of Justice confirmed infringement of the patent-in-suit, but dismissed the Defendant’s defense of compulsory...

 

Actualités PI on 07/20/2025

G 1/23: Conditions for public availability of a product

publication of a technical brochure, non-patent, or patent literature) state of the art within the meaning of Article 54(2) EPC, irrespective of whether the composition or internal structure of...

 

Actualités PI on 08/07/2024

The "klimaneutral" decision of the German Federal Court...

background of the spatial limitations of the chosen means of communication (Sec. 5a (3) UWG)—the provision of the necessary information by indicating a URL or a QR code is sufficient. 3. The...

 

Actualités PI on 03/16/2020

CJEU on the assessment in terms of antitrust law of...

payment of considerable sums by the manufacturer of originator medicines to the manufacturers of generic medicines for a delay of the latters’ market entry. The perception of the manufacturers o...

 

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • »
  • linkedin
  • youtube
  • Instagram
  • Soundcloud
  • Facebook
  • xing
  • RSS
Organisation
  • Contact
  • Presse
  • MyBardehle
  • Protection des données
  • Paramètres des cookies
  • Legal Notices
  • ISO 9001

* Vous trouverez sous Mentions Légales une liste des associés de notre société (PartGmbB).

S'abonner à la newsletter
AMM_2018_Awardauszeichnung_silber_gr_dunkelgrau.png

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG
Partnerschaft mbB

Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte

Prinzregentenplatz 7
81675 Munich
ALLEMAGNE

Téléphone: +49 89 928 05-0
Fax: +49 89 928 05-444
Email: info(at)bardehle.de

© BARDEHLE PAGENBERG 2025

  • Le cabinet
    • Qui sommes-nous
    • Nos Bureaux
    • Prix & Revue de presse
    • Autres Services
  • Équipe
  • Our values
    • Law & Democracy
    • Equal opportunities
    • Durabilité
    • Compliance
    • Quality Management
  • Compétences
    • Domaines juridiques
    • Secteurs industriels
  • Actualités et connaissance
    • Actualités PI
    • Actualités du cabinet
    • Événement IP
    • Vidéos sur la PI
    • Académie PI
    • UPC Decisions
    • European Software Patents
    • Brochures PI & Livres
  • UPC Special
  • IP Academy
  • Contact
  • Recrutement
  • Presse
  • EN
  • DE
  • ES
  • CN
  • JP