Skip navigation
BARDEHLE PAGENBERG Impact. Passion. IP.
BARDEHLE PAGENBERG
  • 日本語
    • English
    • Deutsch
    • Français
    • Español
    • 中文
  • 検索
  • IP Academy
  • お問い合わせ
  • 採用情報
  • 資料
  • 事務所案内
    • 当事務所について
    • 国内外拠点
      • ミュンヘン
      • デュッセルドルフ
      • Hamburg
      • パリ
      • バルセロナ
      • シンガポール
    • 受賞 & プレスレビュー
    • その他のサービス
  • チーム
  • Our values
    • Law & Democracy
    • Equal opportunities
    • サステナビリティ
    • Compliance
    • Quality Management
  • 取扱分野/業界
    • 法分野
      • 特許訴訟
      • 異議申立・無効訴訟
      • ライセンス供与および技術移転
      • 所有物返還請求権
      • 職務発明
      • 不当競争防止法
      • 特許のプロセキューション
      • 商標
      • 意匠
      • 著作権
      • ドメイン名
      • 独占禁止法
      • 特許の価値評価
      • デュー・デリジェンス
      • 営業秘密
    • 業界
      • 電気通信
      • ソフトウェア、IT、コンピュータ技術
      • スポーツ
      • 医療機器
      • 電気工学
      • 自動車
      • 機械工学
      • 化学、製薬、生命科学
      • 物理学
      • 半導体技術
      • 食品
      • ファッション
  • IPニュース & 知識
    • IPニュース
    • 当事務所のニュース
    • IPイベント
    • IPビデオ
    • IPアカデミー
    • UPC Decisions
    • European Software Patents
    • IP冊子 & 書籍
  • UPC Special
 
すべて IP News & Knowledge
  • 1
  • 2
  • »

IPイベント の 03/07/2023

How to patent AI inventions at the EPO?

is one of the most rapidly developing fields of technology. The patentability of AI is a complex and evolving area of law. In particular, before the European Patent Office, there are a number of...

 

IPイベント の 02/20/2024

Beyond Precedent: A Fresh Look at AI Patenting with...

it about? Artificial intelligence (AI) is one of the fastest advancing areas of technology. The legal issues surrounding the patentability of AI are varied, complex, and constantly evolving....

 

IPニュ-ス の 06/24/2025

G 1/24: A win for claim interpretation, a setback for...

light of the entire disclosure. Rather, they have regularly taken the position that the meaning of the claim needs to be clear from the wording of the claim alone. Does this mean that, as a...

 

IPニュ-ス の 04/10/2025

Design Grace Period: European Court Provides Clarity on...

protection afforded by this provision. II. Analysis of the three main arguments 1. Burden of proof Lidl argued that the burden of proving the applicability of the grace period exception lies...

 

IPニュ-ス の 08/07/2024

The "klimaneutral" decision of the German Federal Court...

background of the spatial limitations of the chosen means of communication (Sec. 5a (3) UWG)—the provision of the necessary information by indicating a URL or a QR code is sufficient. 3. The...

 

IPニュ-ス の 07/20/2025

G 1/23: Conditions for public availability of a product

publication of a technical brochure, non-patent, or patent literature) state of the art within the meaning of Article 54(2) EPC, irrespective of whether the composition or internal structure of...

 

IPニュ-ス の 07/27/2022

Amending the description prior to grant of a European...

relaxed in the current version of the Guidelines 2022, but it is still not sufficient to make only minimum amendments, which were sufficient prior to 2021 (it was often sufficient to supplement...

 

当事務所のニュ-ス の 06/11/2012

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG prevails before Federal Supreme...

community of Castell, located in the wine-growing area of Franconia (part of Bavaria), against a decision of the Frankfurt Appeal Court, denying liability of the French company Castel Frères of...

 

IPニュ-ス の 04/03/2025

The „Neoperl” decision of the CJEU on the limits of the...

observed in the context of examination of the absolute grounds for refusal according to Article 7(1) of the EU Regulation No. 207/2009 (“EUTMR 2009”). It does not constitute an error of law if a...

 

IPニュ-ス の 05/22/2025

Mastering Complexities in EU Copyright Law: A...

Court of Justice of the European Union in the Mio and USM Haller / konektra cases (Joined Cases C-580/23 and C-795/23), related to questions of substantive EU copyright law with respect to works...

 

IPニュ-ス の 11/02/2022

EPO Opposition and UPC Revocation Action

extension of the scope of protection after grant, lack of entitlement, and national prior rights existing in any of the UPC member states. b) Duration of the proceedings Considering the duration...

 

当事務所のニュ-ス の 12/12/2023

AAS/EIs available at Munich Local Division of the UPC

The background of this case is that NanoString had already previously tried to obstruct/delay the grant of an injunction in parallel national infringement proceedings in Germany by way of an...

 

IPニュ-ス の 03/11/2015

European Patent Organisation: The first concept for...

envisaged level of the renewal fees will only attract a small minority of users of the European patent system validating at present in a high number of participating member states. In respect of...

 

IPニュ-ス の 08/26/2025

Court of Justice of the European Union: Limitation of...

from using a sign the use of which adversely affects or is liable adversely to affect one of the functions of the trade mark, on the ground that, though being aware of the use of the mark, he or...

 

IPニュ-ス の 04/17/2025

FRAND objection: Higher Regional Court of Munich, final...

Decision of the Higher Regional Court of Munich The Higher Regional Court of Munich confirmed both the finding of patent infringement and the rejection of the FRAND objection by the Regional...

 

IPニュ-ス の 11/20/2023

G1/22 and G2/22: Happy Claimants of Priorities and...

87(1) EPC in favor of the EPO’s competence and the autonomous law of the EPC. The EBoA moreover circumvented the disputed concept of the “PCT joint applicants approach” in favor of the even more...

 

IPニュ-ス の 06/29/2021

The German parliament adopts government bill for a...

facilitate the summary review by infringement courts of lower instances of the prospects of nullity proceedings in the context of the examination of a stay of infringement proceedings. However,...

 

IPニュ-ス の 05/14/2025

Second medical use claims in the UPC system:...

first time in the history of the UPC system ruled on the requirements for the finding of infringement of second medical use claims. The Court held that for a finding of infringement of second...

 

  • 1
  • 2
  • »
  • linkedin
  • youtube
  • Instagram
  • Soundcloud
  • Facebook
  • xing
  • RSS
当事務所
  • お問い合わせ
  • 資料
  • MyBardehle
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Settings
  • 法的通知(英語)
  • ISO 9001

* 当事務所の PartGmbB
のメンバーリストは、法的通知をお読みください。

当事務所のニュースレターにサインアップ
AMM_2018_Awardauszeichnung_silber_gr_dunkelgrau.png

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG
Partnerschaft mbB

Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte

Prinzregentenplatz 7
81675 Munich
GERMANY

Fon: +49 89 928 05-0
Fax: +49 89 928 05-444
Email: info(at)bardehle.de

© BARDEHLE PAGENBERG 2025

  • 事務所案内
    • 当事務所について
    • 国内外拠点
    • 受賞 & プレスレビュー
    • その他のサービス
  • チーム
  • Our values
    • Law & Democracy
    • Equal opportunities
    • サステナビリティ
    • Compliance
    • Quality Management
  • 取扱分野/業界
    • 法分野
    • 業界
  • IPニュース & 知識
    • IPニュース
    • 当事務所のニュース
    • IPイベント
    • IPビデオ
    • IPアカデミー
    • UPC Decisions
    • European Software Patents
    • IP冊子 & 書籍
  • UPC Special
  • IP Academy
  • お問い合わせ
  • 採用情報
  • 資料
  • EN
  • DE
  • FR
  • ES
  • CN