included the order for NanoString to include similar notices concerning the German territory in any offer of the infringing products. NanoString Technologies Inc. and NanoString Technologies...

for 10x Genomics against NanoString | BARDEHLE PAGENBERG ). Notably, 10x Genomics had sent a warning letter to NanoString before approaching the UPC in this regard. NanoString failed to provide...

20, 2023. Specifically, the Munich Local Division held that NanoString Technologies Inc., NanoString Technologies Germany GmbH, and NanoString Technologies Netherlands B.V. infringe the patent...

2023, the German Regional Court of Munich I held in favor of 10x Genomics that Nanostring Technologies Inc. and Nanostring Technologies GmbH infringe European patent EP 2 794 928 B1 by offering...

enforced against a security bond. NanoString Technologies Inc. and NanoString Technologies GmbH filed an appeal which is pending. Prior to these judgements NanoString Technologies Inc. tried to...

Division of the European Patent Office (“EPO”) dismissed the oppositions filed by NanoString Technologies Inc. (“NanoString”) and two other opponents, ruling in favor of the patent proprietor...

historic patent litigation spanning the UPC, Germany, the EPO, and the US against Bruker (formerly NanoString) shortly after the EPO upheld a key patent-in-suit, namely EP 4 108 782, in slightly...

Genomics and Bruker (formerly NanoString) in May 2025 ( BARDEHLE PAGENBERG paves the way for global settlement of landmark litigation between 10x Genomics and Bruker/NanoString )....

5/83, G 3/08), referring specifically to the UPC’s Court of Appeal decision in the 10x Genomics v. Nanostring case (UPC_CoA_335/2023), where the UPC had adopted the very same position. Further,...