UPCの判例　間接侵害、均等論、企業および経営者の責任 UPCの有効性に関するアプローチ： EPO基準の採用か、独自のアプローチの展開か？ 標準必須特許とFRANDに関する新たな判例 仮処分 日時　2025年1月30日（木）・午後５時～午後6時半頃（日本時間） 場所　ホテルオークラ東京（〒105-0001 東京都港区虎ノ門2-10-4）...

On March 12, 2025, the European General Court (Second Chamber) delivered a significant judgment in Case T-66/24 between Lidl Vertriebs GmbH & Co. KG (“Lidl”) and EUIPO/Liquidleds Lighting Corp....

under what conditions? Oral proceedings before the EBA took place on March 28, 2025. The decision was rendered on June 18, 2025. 2. Decision In its remarkably concise decision, containing five...

Press release dated January 13, 2025 At the beginning of the new year, there is again movement on the career ladder in the team of patent attorneys and attorneys-at-law: BARDEHLE PAGENBERG...

Most of the amendments will take effect four months after their entry into force, i.e. , on May 1, 2025 ( Phase I ). Pursuant to Article 19 (4) Designs Directive, there is a grace period until...

Press release dated March 31, 2025 On February 6, 2019, Pioneer filed infringement complaints for a total of three patents: EP 2 261 877 before the Regional Court of Hamburg, and EP 2 447 941...

Wuttke, Dr. Volkmar Henke, Dr. Tilman Müller, Dr. Axel Berger and Dr. Patrick Heckeler. Copyright 2025 BARDEHLE PAGENBERG Partnerschaft mbB. All rights reserved. All contents of our website are...

Judgement dated April 10, 2025 – UPC_CFI_505/2023, ACT_57355/2023 (Sanofi, Regeneron vs. Amgen) The Local Division of Düsseldorf is the first UPC panel to set out the prerequisites and establish...

Docket no. 6 U 3824/22 In its final judgment dated March 20, 2025, the Higher Regional Court of Munich commented for the first time on the FRAND objection in a decision in principal proceedings....