The UPC’s role in global patent litigation

A closer look at the strategic use of the UPC – taken both under a claimant’s and a defendant’s perspective

By JUVE PATENT and BARDEHLE PAGENBERG
 

JUVE PATENT and BARDEHLE PAGENBERG invite you to an informal in-house IP networking event with a keynote speech by Prof. Dr. Meier-Beck and expert speakers from leading tech companies.

 


 

Date & Time

Friday, June 06, 2025, 3 p.m. – 7 p.m. (CET),
followed by a BBQ reception on the rooftop terrace.
The live streaming of the event will start at 4 p.m.

Location 

Forty Four | PLACE TO BE,
Rolandstraße 44, 40476 Düsseldorf, Germany 

Format

Hybrid (in-person attendance plus live stream to allow international participation)
 


 

Two years into the Unified Patent Court, case numbers are consistently increasing and the new system is on track to become a global patent litigation hub. Without a doubt, the UPC has quickly established itself as a strong player in the global competition between patent litigation systems, and provides new options for both patentees and defendants. 

To patentees, the UPC offers an additional tool that allows more complex and sophisticated cross-jurisdictional patent assertions.

  • What advantage does the UPC have regarding cross-border decisions, including across the borders of UPC territory?
  • How do patentees decide which systems to use?
  • Will the UPC completely replace national patent litigation in Europe, or will the new CJEU decision BSH/Electrolux even strengthen the national systems?

For defendants, the central revocation action provides a new path to challenge the validity of European Patents, in addition to counterclaims for revocation, national invalidation actions, and EPO oppositions.

  • Is it advisable to raise multiple validity challenges in parallel?
  • How does the UPC deal with such parallel challenges?
  • And under what circumstances should defendants proactively file a revocation action, even if an infringement action is not yet pending?

These and other topics around the role of the UPC in global patent litigation strategies, both offensive and defensive, will be at the centre of our event.

Learn more about the experiences with the new system of some of the most frequent users of the UPC, and how it can impact your own company’s litigation strategies.

Don’t miss this exclusive opportunity to discuss with journalists from JUVE PATENT, industry representatives, and lawyers/patent attorneys from the leading IP boutique BARDEHLE PAGENBERG how in-house experts can make the best use of the UPC in cross-jurisdictional patent litigation.

We welcome a wide range of industries, be it from the claimant’s or defendant’s side. This is an opportunity to learn from the strategies of your peer group, to exchange experiences with the UPC and other litigation systems, and to discuss the impact of the UPC on global patent litigation.

After our presentation and the discussions (after 7 p.m.), we would be delighted to continue our exchange and invite you to enjoy our BBQ evening event on the rooftop terrace, with a wonderful view over Düsseldorf. 

 

Please note that the registration deadline for attending in person is May 23, 2025.

We look forward to meeting you in person or online!

 

Registration required

Please register here.
You will subsequently receive a confirmation email.

Participation in this event is free.

IP Event
Patent Litigation, Licensing & Technology Transfer, Patent Prosecution

Date


Location
Forty Four | PLACE TO BE
Rolandstraße 44
40476 Düsseldorf

Conference Language
English
Register Now

Agenda

3 pm

Registration | Networking

4 pm

Welcome Address | Introduction

Mathieu Klos, Editor JUVE PATENT

Dr. Christof Karl, Co-Managing Partner BARDEHLE PAGENBERG

4.05 pm

Opening Keynote "How does the UPC understand the concept of obviousness?"

Prof. Dr. Peter Meier-Beck, Presiding Judge (ret.) | German Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice)

4.30 pm

Panel 1: UPC assertion strategies in a global litigation landscape

Moderators: Dr. Tilman Müller, Dr. Jan Bösing (BARDEHLE PAGENBERG)

Panelists: Craig Burnett (Dolby), Jeremy Whitley (Honeywell), Dr. Thomas Dreiser (Huawei)

This panel addresses the following aspects: 

  • Advantages and disadvantages of the UPC compared to other litigation systems
  • How do patentees decide where to assert patents
  • Does a potential “long-arm jurisdiction” of the UPC make a difference?
  • Is national litigation still relevant?
  • Potential impact of the CJEU BSH/Electrolux decision 
  • Strategic use of parallel litigation in different systems
     
    5.30 pm

    Coffee Break

    5.50 pm

    Panel 2: Invalidity proceedings and defense strategies at the UPC

    Moderators: Dr. Christof Karl, Sabrina Smyczek (BARDEHLE PAGENBERG)

    Panelists: Ceren Pala-Okat (Philips), Armin Schwitulla (Nokia), Dr. Anne Julia Meinel (Roche)

    This panel addresses the following aspects: 

    • Advantages and disadvantages of UPC central revocation actions compared to other invalidity proceedings
    • Case law development on invalidity, particularly novelty, inventive step and added matter
    • Is it advisable to challenge a patent in multiple parallel proceedings?
    • How does the UPC deal with parallel invalidity proceedings?
    • Under what circumstances is it advisable to proactively file a central revocations action, even if an infringement action is not pending?
    6.50 pm

    Closing remarks

    Mathieu Klos, Editor JUVE PATENT

    7 pm

    Networking: BBQ / Drinks and snacks on the terrace and in the lounge area