Infringement by equivalent embodiment likely: The challenged embodiments comprised an L-shaped strip…
Direct infringement when supplying set of components: If the patent-protected product is…
Production of license agreements in FRAND context ordered.: Pursuant to R. 190 RoP and taking into…
Key takeaway If the language of proceedings shall be changed and the parties’ interests are weighed,…
Key takeaway Appropriate length of objection is related to length of application for provisional…
Strict requirement for R. 36 RoP application for written submissions beyond those foreseen in the…
Proportionality, flexibility, fairness, and equity are criterions for exercising discretion on…
No Reimbursement of Court Fees Following Settlement in Provisional Measures Proceedings: The LD…
No disclosure of confidential information in parallel national proceedings: In response to a request…
The application for a default decision merely supplements, but does not replace, the main…
Claim interpretation: Feature 1.6 of claim 1 in the patent-in-suit (EP 1651838) was central to both…
The scope of a review under R. 333 RoP is marginal and limited to the reasoned grounds submitted by…
The court may separate proceedings against multiple defendants on its own initiative to ensure…
UPCA and RoP are not subject to interpretation by the CJEU: The UPC must interpret its own…
No evident error if decision’s reasons are not yet available: Suspensive effect of an appeal may be…
Application for suspensive effect is inadmissable if no appeal is filed: It is not possible to apply…
No further written submissions after the oral hearing: Pursuant to R. 36 RoP, the judge-rapporteur…
Request for simultaneous interpretation pursuant to Rule 109.2 RoP must be justified: In the absence…
