Skip navigation
BARDEHLE PAGENBERG Impact. Passion. IP.
BARDEHLE PAGENBERG
  • Español
    • English
    • Deutsch
    • Français
    • 中文
    • 日本語
  • Buscar
  • IP Academy
  • Contacto
  • Carrera
  • Prensa
  • Nuestro bufete
    • Quiénes somos
    • Oficinas
      • Múnich
      • Düsseldorf
      • Hamburg
      • Paris
      • Barcelona
      • Singapur
    • Galardones & Comentarios de Prensa
    • Otros servicios
  • Equipo
  • Our values
    • Law & Democracy
    • Equal opportunities
    • Sostenibilidad
    • Compliance
    • Quality Management
  • Competencias
    • Áreas legales
      • Violación de patentes
      • Procedimiento de oposición y de nulidad de patentes
      • Licencias & Transferencia de tecnología
      • Acciones de vindicación
      • Derecho relativo a las invenciones laborales
      • Derecho relacionado con la competencia desleal
      • Solicitudes de patentes
      • Derecho de marcas
      • Protección de los diseños
      • Derecho de autor
      • Derecho sobre los nombres de dominio
      • Legislación antimonopolio
      • Valoración de patentes
      • Diligencia debida en materia de Propiedad Intelectual (PI)
      • Secretos comerciales
    • Industrias
      • Telecomunicaciones
      • Software, IT- & Tecnología informática
      • Artículos deportivos
      • Dispositivos médicos
      • Electrotecnia/Electrónica
      • Automotive
      • Ingeniería mecánica
      • Química, Campo farmacéutico & Ciencias de la Vida
      • Física
      • Tecnología de semiconductores
      • Alimentación
      • Moda
  • Noticias y Conocimiento PI
    • Noticias PI
    • Noticias del bufete
    • Eventos PI
    • Vídeos sobre PI
    • Academia PI
    • UPC Decisions
    • European Software Patents
    • Brochures PI & Libros
  • UPC Special
 
Todas Noticias y Conocimiento PI Equipo Academia PI Carrera
  • «
  • ....
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • »

Noticias PI on 05/24/2019

Claims for residual damages with respect to acts for...

elements of the offense of infringing another’s right under the law of unjust enrichment. However, there is no justification for excluding an obligation of restitution for contributory acts of...

 

Noticias PI on 04/10/2010

ECJ decides on plant variety protection for SUMCOL 01,...

Board of Appeal of the CPVO and the General Court of the EU (formerly Court of First Instance) remained unsuccessful. Now, the ECJ has dismissed the appeal of Mr Schräder against the decision of...

 

Noticias PI on 02/02/2012

German Federal Supreme Court strengthens position of...

manifest in that only 12 of the 26 claims of the foreign-language application were entirely translated. The legal fiction of the non-filed application – that is the denial of the filing date –...

 

Noticias del bufete on 07/31/2024

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG continues to expand its team with...

most recently as chairman of a Technical Board of Appeal in the field of life sciences and as a member of the Enlarged Board of Appeal. He is also a member of the team of authors of the...

 

Noticias PI on 03/02/2020

New guidelines for the FRAND defence in patent...

Regional Court of Munich I, also defines the onus of presentation and burden of proof regarding the use of portfolio patents in a manner that benefits the Plaintiff. While the Regional Court of...

 

Academia PI on 12/04/2024

UPC III: Proceedings (types of proceedings,...

 

Noticias PI on 05/14/2025

Second medical use claims in the UPC system:...

first time in the history of the UPC system ruled on the requirements for the finding of infringement of second medical use claims. The Court held that for a finding of infringement of second...

 

Noticias PI on 07/17/2020

The ministerial draft bill ratifying the Unified Patent...

the participation of merely Member States of the EU in order to accommodate the concerns raised in the opinion of the European Court of Justice G 1/09 with regard to the participation of...

 

Noticias PI on 11/28/2024

The RCD is dead – Long live the EU design!

Designs Regulation ”) [1] and the text of “Directive (EU) 2024/2823 of the European Parliament and of the Council of October 23, 2024, on the legal protection of designs (recast)” (“ Designs...

 

Noticias PI on 10/27/2011

ECJ rules on validity and infringement test under...

freedom (Article 10 [2] CDR), (ii) the concept of the informed user and his level of attention (Article 10 [1] CDR), (iii) the scope of the General Court’s power of review (Article 61 [2] CDR),...

 

Noticias del bufete on 10/28/2011

ECJ rules on validity and infringement test under...

freedom (Article 10 [2] CDR), (ii) the concept of the informed user and his level of attention (Article 10 [1] CDR), (iii) the scope of the General Court’s power of review (Article 61 [2] CDR),...

 

Noticias PI on 04/10/2025

Design Grace Period: European Court Provides Clarity on...

and maintained the proper distribution of the burden of proof throughout the proceedings. 2. Assessment of evidence The Applicant challenged the Board’s evaluation of the evidence, pointing to...

 

Noticias del bufete on 10/10/2017

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG succeeds before Court of Justice who...

joint use of the goods thus offered for sale and the specific goods of the holder of those rights, carries out an act of reproduction for the purpose of making ‘citations’ within the meaning of...

 

Noticias PI on 10/07/2024

Recent decision by the EUIPO Board of Appeal: Sound...

office proceedings. In doing so, the Board of Appeal primarily confirmed the reasoning of the previous decision. The Board of Appeal upheld the finding that the sound sequence reproduced the...

 

Noticias del bufete on 10/18/2013

European Patent Office: Administrative Council of the...

remains pending until the expiry of the time limit of 2 months for filing the appeal. 5. One of the aims of the introduction of the time limits in 2010 was to prevent a misuse of divisional...

 

Noticias PI on 06/26/2018

Claim interpretation in case of incorrect cited prior...

The decision of the Higher Regional Court of Duesseldorf (“Higher Regional Court”) deals with the interpretation of a patent claim in case of objectively incorrect, claim limiting, cited prior...

 

Noticias PI on 07/03/2015

European Patent Organisation: The revised concept for...

the level of renewal fees. For the latter, the EPO has revised its original proposal (SC/4/15 of March 3, 2015) and submitted a new document SC/18/15 of May 7, 2015 to the Select Committee of...

 

Noticias del bufete on 10/29/2019

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG successfully defends patent of iVIS...

the decision of the Opposition Division of the EPO, iVIS had filed a complaint against SCHWIND before the Regional Court of Mannheim in February, asserting the infringement of claim 1 of EP 1...

 

  • «
  • ....
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • »
  • linkedin
  • youtube
  • Instagram
  • Soundcloud
  • Facebook
  • xing
  • RSS
Organisation
  • Contacto
  • Prensa
  • MyBardehle
  • Protección de Datos
  • Configuración de cookies
  • Legal Notices
  • ISO 9001

* For a list of the members of our
PartGmbB, see our Legal Notices.

Suscribirse a newsletter
AMM_2018_Awardauszeichnung_silber_gr_dunkelgrau.png

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG
Partnerschaft mbB

Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte

Prinzregentenplatz 7
81675 Munich
ALEMANIA

Teléfono: +49 89 928 05-0
Fax: +49 89 928 05-444
Correo electrónico: info(at)bardehle.de

© BARDEHLE PAGENBERG 2025

  • Nuestro bufete
    • Quiénes somos
    • Oficinas
    • Galardones & Comentarios de Prensa
    • Otros servicios
  • Equipo
  • Our values
    • Law & Democracy
    • Equal opportunities
    • Sostenibilidad
    • Compliance
    • Quality Management
  • Competencias
    • Áreas legales
    • Industrias
  • Noticias y Conocimiento PI
    • Noticias PI
    • Noticias del bufete
    • Eventos PI
    • Vídeos sobre PI
    • Academia PI
    • UPC Decisions
    • European Software Patents
    • Brochures PI & Libros
  • UPC Special
  • IP Academy
  • Contacto
  • Carrera
  • Prensa
  • EN
  • DE
  • FR
  • CN
  • JP